Fixed Income Outlook: Diverging Global Inflation Paths

Market Review and Q3 Outlook

KEY SUMMARY POINTS

  • Policy uncertainty and tariffs are steepening yield curves despite soft economic data and signals of easing.
  • Canada faces sticky inflation, limiting rate cuts, while Europe benefits from deflationary forces that may cap yields.
  • Credit remains resilient, but security selection and tactical duration management are key in this volatile environment.

While Trump is likely to persist in sowing chaos and dominating the news cycle, it remains to be seen whether his attention has shifted away from trade policy as we reach the halfway point of 2025. The Israel-Iran conflict may draw focus from domestic issues, but more market-friendly initiatives—particularly deregulation—could be on the agenda, especially with U.S. mid-term elections on the horizon in 2026. The 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs set to expire on July 9, now appears likely to be extended for countries negotiating in good faith. Mercantilism remains in full effect; the G7 Summit in mid-June should clarify the link between NATO member countries raising defence spending and receiving tariff relief.

As we noted last quarter, a continued soft landing and fixed-income market asymmetry remain our base case. The risk of a “Liz Truss/U.K. moment” and untethering of long bond yields has risen but remains unlikely. Yield curves typically steepen during easing cycles, and fiscal policy, combined with the ongoing risk of tariffs, has pushed long yields higher, even as U.S. growth contracted in the first quarter due to a record drag from net exports and inventory building ahead of tariffs. Sentiment and survey-based economic data, typically used as leading indicators, had been weak through the spring but began to turn more positive as June progressed, while real-time or lagging hard economic data have remained resilient. June’s Consumer Price Index print was the fourth downside surprise which, alongside some tariff clarity, should give the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) greater confidence to cut overnight interest rates, provided companies absorb temporary cost increases rather than passing them onto consumers.

Where the U.S. has experienced weakness in soft data, Canada has seen weakness in both soft and hard data. In the second quarter, the Bank of Canada held rates steady at 2.75% for two consecutive meetings, but the seven existing interest rate cuts may be sufficient to ward off recession. Smaller-than-previously expected increases in mortgage renewal rates should help, at the margin, to support consumer spending and bank balance sheets. While economic data remains weighed down by uncertainty and tariffs, core inflation has risen back above 3%. The Bank of Canada is awaiting greater clarity on the economy and inflation before increasing monetary accommodation. The market is currently pricing in only one more 25 bp cut this year.

Following Trump’s tariff announcement in April, Canadian government bond yields bear-steepened. Despite headwinds from tariffs and lower immigration, the long end of the yield curve is underperforming. Provincial and federal governments are increasing fiscal stimulus through deficit spending to help offset economic pressures and diversify trade away from the United States, though this will increase bond supply and could push inflation higher. For the time being, we are leaning toward maintaining or reducing duration. That said, a material deterioration in the economy could cap inflationary pressures and drive additional rate cuts. Should we anticipate such an outcome, we would likely reverse course on duration.

In the rest of the world, European growth has improved but remains below its long-run average. Infrastructure and defence spending, particularly in Germany, should provide additional support. Strong deflationary forces remain—negative population growth, rigid regulations, and high taxes—which should mitigate the inflationary impact of the increased deficit spending. Bond yields have likely peaked. Likewise in China, GDP is tracking well below the government’s 5% growth target, and the government is spending heavily to support the economy. In a new era of tariffs, nearshoring, and friendshoring, China is unlikely to export deflation to the rest of the world as it has done in the past. Japan remains an outlier, with Europe’s demographic challenges and a rigid business culture. Inflation, which finally turned positive in 2022, has proven sticky above the Bank of Japan’s 2% target, even as yen strength has cooled export competitiveness.

Strong fundamentals and a heavily imbalanced supply-demand dynamic will continue to support corporate bonds. Given high all-in yields and significantly improved quality—especially in high yield compared to its historical norms—credit spreads can stay tighter longer than traditional models might suggest. Tight credit spreads could, in theory, encourage borrowers to aggressively lever their balance sheets for share repurchases or acquisitions. However, this is not the corporate behaviour we are currently witnessing (see chart below), nor do we expect it in the near term. The same uncertainty that has stalled the IPO market is prompting management teams to play defence, with several investment-grade issuers tendering for long bonds at prices below par.

Our counsel has been to remain tactical in both government and corporate bond markets, as the Trump Administration continues to use policy uncertainty as a negotiating tool. While we believe the overall direction of government bond yields is lower, the path forward will not be straight line. This is an environment that should reward sound strategy and disciplined security selection over outright risk-taking.

GLOBAL M&A DEAL COUNT

Source: Bloomberg Finance L.P., Apollo. As of June 9, 2025

To open this article in a shareable format, click here.

About the Author

Geof Marshall


Geof Marshall, CFA

SVP, Head of Fixed Income & Lead – Private Markets
CI Global Asset Management

Geof Marshall, SVP, Head of Fixed Income & Lead – Private Markets, joined CI GAM in 2006 and leads the fixed income group’s high yield team efforts in addition to leading the private markets group. Geof is also the lead manager on CI GAM’s income strategies, and co-manages the private markets and income & growth funds as well as a number of multi-asset fixed income portfolios. He brings over 25 years of valued industry experience to his role at CI GAM, especially in asset allocation and analyzing, managing and trading corporate bonds, leveraged loans, and private credit. Prior to CI GAM, Geof was a portfolio manager at Manulife Financial. Geof is a CFA charterholder with a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from the University of Western Ontario. He is also a member of the CFA Society Toronto and sits on the Investment Committee at the Royal Ontario Museum.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS

This document is provided as a general source of information and should not be considered personal, legal, accounting, tax or investment advice, or construed as an endorsement or recommendation of any entity or security discussed. Every effort has been made to ensure that the material contained in this document is accurate at the time of publication. Market conditions may change which may impact the information contained in this document. All charts and illustrations in this document are for illustrative purposes only. They are not intended to predict or project investment results. Individuals should seek the advice of professionals, as appropriate, regarding any particular investment. Investors should consult their professional advisors prior to implementing any changes to their investment strategies.

Certain statements contained in this communication are based in whole or in part on information provided by third parties and CI Global Asset Management has taken reasonable steps to ensure their accuracy. Market conditions may change which may impact the information contained in this document.

Certain names, words, titles, phrases, logos, icons, graphics, or designs in this document may constitute trade names, registered or unregistered trademarks or service marks of CI Investments Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates, used with permission. All other marks are the property of their respective owners and are used with permission.

Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” or “estimate,” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained herein are based upon what CI Global Asset Management and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, neither CI Global Asset Management nor the portfolio manager can assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The opinions expressed in the communication are solely those of the author(s) and are not to be used or construed as investment advice or as an endorsement or recommendation of any entity or security discussed.